Oct 7

The more people steal and consume hollywood content the better. Gradually funding will be leaked from the illegal sources and the consumer will have to be more and more responsible for the content. This will result in far more super shitty, but meaningful content. As well as an overal itegral increase in meaningful content. Community produced, conservative budget. Eventually people may have to devote more and more of their time to these non-profit ventures which will mean they are probably spending less money, and therefore will need to labor less. The consumption will find a balance with the needs, and as long as the system isn’t controlled or corrupted everyone will live happily ever after.  Until the end
Or the machine will take over. One of the two.

http://dyotron.net/rifts/bilder/chars/machinep.jpg

Oct 5

In todays day and age of modern “convieniences” we need standards. Most of us aren’t technological geeks, and really it isn’t a very healthy life-style to begin with. I want to know how to teach my son to file bookmarks in a long-term easy way, that doesn’t warp his mind into thinking about nested folders. Just keeping up on whats out there, and trying not to get caught up supporting “the man”, takes to much time when it comes to “testing” early computer tool prototypes.

Although it would mean giving up some control, what I want to find is a group I trust (maybe even I could be part of the panel), that has similar ideas about what digital technology should be, to help determine what tools I should be using and supporting. All these tools should be towards open-source, or maybe not.?

People want to believe that corporations represent the same evils that American politics do. This is partially true, but a good percentage of share holders are the middle people and friends of most of us, and the consumers are all of us. A good amount of any large corporation is only a mirror of what all “1st World” people are to afraid to confront. Maybe then, a global Google economy wouldn’t be so bad. Especially with Yahoo’s Artificial Artificial Intelligence running the show. The climates and peoples of the climates would be the bits and the bytes. Even a single out of place bit can crash the machine.
Here’s a question. Would you rather a computer programmed by the people run the global economy, or the Bush (or ??) family?

What if the next ballet was Google vs. Mrs. Bush.